9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (10) TMI 1559X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... USTICE A.S. BOPANNA FOR THE PETITIONER : SRI B.S.SACHIN, ADV. FOR M/S DHARMASHREE ASSTS. FOR THE RESPONDENT : SRI B. JAYAPRAKASH, ADV., SRI S.ANAND RAO, ADV. FOR M/S. N.V.S.ASSTS. O R D E R The petitioner is before this Court seeking for issue of direction to respondent No.1 to consider the representation dated 27.04.2011 as at Annexure-N to the petition. The petitioner is al ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er is made in the instant petition, considering the fact that the petitioner-company has produced the communications exchanged between the petitioner and respondent No.2 along with the application in IA.No.1/2013 for Early Hearing , it would lead to a circumstance that the petitioner has also accepted that the matter requires to be negotiated with respondent No.2. If this aspect of the matter is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e the same, even till this date, not even a part of the payment has been made by the petitioner and therefore the request as sought by the petitioner is liable to be rejected by this Court is the contention. 4. In the light of the fact that even as per the communications produced along with the application in IA.No.1/2013 since the petitioner-company has not shown their bonafides by making any ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
