9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (9) TMI 1968X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... settle private scores. The war launched by the petitioner has gone unabated from the year 2011 for the past six years. Every Court has taken a lenient view, even while dismissing the writ petitions of the petitioner, which has perhaps emboldened him to again and again make an attempt through this Court to settle a private dispute that he has. It is high time that the abuse of process of Court is put an end to by imposing costs. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. - WRIT PETITION No.15333 of 2017 - - - Dated:- 11-9-2017 - THE HON BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HON BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. RAJANI For the Petitioner : Mr. M. Janardan Rao For the Respondent : Mr. K. Lakshman, Assistant Solicitor General, Mr. J.V.Pras ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g arguments. Despite noting this, this Court took a lenient view and merely closed W.P.No.11301 of 2016 and batch, lastly on 19.07.2016, after making certain observations. In order to avoid the repetition of the facts, paragraphs 3 to 8 of the order, dated 19.07.2016, may be usefully extracted as follows: It appears that the petitioner in these writ petitions, became the subscriber to a chit floated by Kapil Chit Funds Private Limited, which is the contesting respondent in one of the writ petitions. The other companies which are engaged in different types of business but which form part of the same group are cited as the 4th respondent in the other writ petitions. Kapil Chit Funds Private Limited has been cited as the 5 th respondent i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... petitioner has started haunting and harassing all the companies which form part of the same group by filing innumerable cases. Two volumes of orders passed by various courts in a number of writ petitions, writ appeals, criminal complaints, criminal miscellaneous petitions etc., are presented before us for our perusal. Therefore, the learned counsel for the private respondent contended that these petitions should not be entertained and that at the instance of such a person, no mandamus of the nature sought for can be granted. The grievance of the contesting respondents may be justified at least partly if not wholly. It appears that the writ petitioner has virtually declared a war on the contesting private respondent, in different forums. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 017 in the premises of the 6th respondent Company. Upon seeing news items in the print and electronic media that a few crores had been recovered during the raids, the petitioner got motivated once again, commenced war against the respondents, and has come up with the present writ petition. But, as we have pointed out earlier, the writ Court is not intended for people to settle private scores. The war launched by the petitioner has gone unabated from the year 2011 for the past six years. Every Court has taken a lenient view, even while dismissing the writ petitions of the petitioner, which has perhaps emboldened him to again and again make an attempt through this Court to settle a private dispute that he has. Therefore, we are of the conside ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
