TMI Blog2016 (2) TMI 1324X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lant in the present appeal following COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH VERSUS M/S NAHAR INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES LTD AND OTHERS [ 2010 (5) TMI 608 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT ] has already been decided by a Division Bench of this Court in Union of India v. Mohini Industries [ 2015 (3) TMI 702 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT taking the same view and additionally relying upon COMMISSIONER OF SE ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by the Appellant as a question of law is with regard to service tax payment by reverse charge mechanism through utilisation of CENVAT credit. Though the Tribunal has inter-alia relied upon 2012 (25) STR 129 (Punjab & Haryana) (CCE v. Nahar Industrial Enterprises), the department has preferred a Special Leave Petition against the same which is pending consideration. It is acknowledged that there i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|