2009 (1) TMI 933

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .N. Gupta, Advs. ORDER 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against an order dated 23rd of September, 2005 of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur, whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed an appeal filed by the appellant on the sole ground of limitation. 3. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. After going through the impugned order as well a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... seen whether sufficient cause had been shown by the appellant for condoning the delay in filing the appeal before it. We ourselves have also examined the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act before the High Court and, in our opinion, the delay of 178 days has been properly explained by the appellant. That being the position, we set aside the impugned order of the High Court. Co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X