9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (2) TMI 362X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... uld remain in operation during the period of investigation, not exceeding 90 days. It is admitted position that in the present case, not even the complaint contemplated under Section 44 of the PMLA Act was instituted by the concerned Authority within the period of 90 days and eventually it came to be filed on 03/05/2019. Merely because the Delhi High Court had passed the above quoted interim order in Writ Petition filed by Mr. Vinod Phadke, the respondent in Appeal bearing No. 2509 of 2019, it would not ipso facto mean that the period specified under Section 8 (3) of the PMLA Act stood extended. Nothing prevented the concerned Authority from filing the complaint and investigating into the matter. It is also worth noting that a subsequ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... be, Advocate for the Respondent. ORAL ORDER : (Per Manish Pitale,J.) 1. By this order one Writ Petition and two appeals shall stand disposed of. 2. The Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner, inter alia, seeking quashing of an order dated 13/09/2018, passed by the Adjudicating Authority under Section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as 'PMLA Act'), whereby provisional attachment of the property of the petitioner under Section 5 of the PMLA Act, has been confirmed. 3. The appeals have been filed by the Directorate of Enforcement, challenging orders dated 20/09/2019, passed by the Appellate Tribunal under the PMLA Act, whereby appeals of the respondents stood allowed and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... under Section 44 of the PMLA Act, came to be filed on 03/05/2019, which was well beyond the period of 90 days specified under Section 8 (3) of the PMLA Act. 6. The respondents in the aforesaid two appeals approached the Appellate Tribunal under Section 26 of the PMLA Act to challenge the order of attachment under Section 8 (3) of the PMLA Act. By orders dated 20/09/2019, the Tribunal allowed the appeals. The Directorate of Enforcement has filed these two appeals challenging the orders passed by the Appellate Tribunal. 7. Insofar as the Writ Petition is concerned, the grounds raised in the Writ Petition challenging the order of the Adjudicating Authority dated 13/09/2018, whereby the attachment of property of the petitioner was confir ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd supported the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal in the aforesaid appeal, whereby it was held that the order confirming the attachment of the property under Section 8 (3) of PMLA Act had lapsed in the face of the admitted facts. 11. Mr. Vaze, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant - Directorate of Enforcement in the appeals and the respondents in the Writ Petition, submitted that the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority dated 13/09/2018, could not be said to have lapsed under Section 8 (3) of the PMLA Act, for the reason that one of the aforesaid individuals i.e. Mr. Vinod Phadke had approached the Delhi High Court challenging the proceedings on the ground that the alleged offences in question had been committed prior to e ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion, not exceeding 90 days. 14. It is admitted position that in the present case, not even the complaint contemplated under Section 44 of the PMLA Act was instituted by the concerned Authority within the period of 90 days and eventually it came to be filed on 03/05/2019. Merely because the Delhi High Court had passed the above quoted interim order in Writ Petition filed by Mr. Vinod Phadke, the respondent in Appeal bearing No. 2509 of 2019, it would not ipso facto mean that the period specified under Section 8 (3) of the PMLA Act stood extended. Nothing prevented the concerned Authority from filing the complaint and investigating into the matter. The purport of the interim order passed by the Delhi High Court was properly appreciated an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
