Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2014 (6) TMI 1063

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... als) has sustained the order passed by the Assessing Officer erred in disallowing of Rs. 5,09,22,000/- u/s.43B being interest paid to Government of Tamil Nadu. 2. The appellant company submits that disallowance u/s.43B is not applicable to it as it is a Govt. company. 3. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has sustained the order passed by the Assessing Officer erred in disallowing of Rs. 2,08,64,000/- u/s.43B being interest paid to Government of Tamil Nadu. 4. The appellant company submits that disallowance u/s.43B is not applicable to it as it is a Government company. 5. The appellant company submits that the amount shown as loss of revaluation of Rs. 2,08,000/- is actually depreciation on loose tools like dyes, books, lab equipm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... essee made a claim. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) further observed that prior period interest expenses of Rs. 509.22 lakhs are payable to public financial institutions/ Governmental bodies and hence allowability of interest payments are governed by the provisions of section 43B of the Act. 6. Counsel for the assessee submits that entire prior period interest of Rs. 509.22 lakhs was paid to Government of Tamil Nadu and such payment is not governed by the provisions of section 43B of the Act as it was not paid to any public financial institution or governmental bodies. Counsel for the assessee placing reliance on the decision of the coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of DCIT Vs. The Kallakurichi Co-op. Sugar Mills Pvt. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ders of lower authorities. The Assessing Officer while completing the assessment disallowed Rs. 509.22 lakhs out of prior period expenses of Rs. 1529.39 lakhs debited by the assessee during this assessment year. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) observed that interest expenses brought forward from earlier years ( period prior to 1.4.2006) and debited in the profit and loss account during the financial year 2006-07 are Rs. 1054.38 lakhs. The Government of Tamil Nadu waived Rs. 552.78 lakhs pertaining to the period upto 2003-04 leaving balance of Rs. 509.22 lakhs to be paid by the assessee. This balance interest of Rs. 509.22 lakhs represents interest for the financial years 2004-05 and 2005-06 and was debited to the profit and loss ac .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... provisions of section 43B of the Act are concerned, we are not in agreement with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) as prior period interest was paid by the assessee to the Government of Tamil Nadu and Government of Tamil Nadu is not a public financial institution / governmental body which comes under the provisions of section 43B of the Act. The co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of The Kallakurichi Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. (supra) observed that any amount payable to a Government is not hit by section 43B of the Act. Thus, the observation of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) that these interest payments made to Government of Tamil Nadu are hit by the provisions of section 43B of the Act is not correct and reversed. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... it is paid before the due date for filing of return of income to allow the said interest as expenditure in respect of the balance of Rs. 183.90 lakhs. 12. Counsel for the assessee submits that Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) disallowed the said amount stating that provisions of section 43B of the Act are attracted and since the assessee has not paid the said amount before the due date for filing of return, the same is to be disallowed. Counsel submits that Rs. 183.90 lakhs was paid to the Government of Tamil Nadu. Since the interest was paid to Government of Tamil Nadu, provisions of section 43B were not attracted. 13. Departmental Representative supports the orders of lower authorities in sustaining the disallowance. Departmental .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates