9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (3) TMI 734X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Court does not find any justification in keeping the writ petition pending and deems it appropriate that a direction be issued for such payment. The respondents no.1 and 3 are directed to ensure payment of ₹ 1,44,65,283/- as per Form GST RFD-06, dated 12.01.2021 under the signature of the respondent no.3 to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of production of the co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and Mr. Suresh Kumar Routhu, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent no.2. 2. The matter is repeatedly being adjourned on the prayer made by the respondents seeking time for filing counter affidavit. 3. The petitioner has moved the Court for the following relief: i) Declaring the actions of the respondents in not sanctioning the interest amount accrued owing to the delay cau ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g bill no.2021-167078 as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, in violation of the provisions of the GST Acts and consequently direct the respondents to disburse the balance SGST portion of the tax amount of INR 1,44,65,283 forthwith along with applicable interest for delayed refund till the date of actual payment; iii) Pass such other or further order or orders as this Court deems fit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... RFD-06, dated 12.01.2021 under the signature of the respondent no.3 to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of production of the copy of order before the 3rd respondent as per Section 56 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 8. This Court would indicate that if such refund is required to be paid along with statutory interest thereon, the same shall also be paid ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
