9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (5) TMI 195X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ing the respondents, and that she owed a sum of Rs.32,00,000/- to the respondents - HELD THAT:- On perusal of the Judgment of the Trial Court as well the Appellate Court, it is opined that the petitioner has not made out any good ground to admit these revision petitions. The findings on facts cannot be disturbed. The Trial Court has not awarded sentence of imprisonment. In all these cases the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... victed for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act in all these cases and that she lost all the appeals preferred by her. 3. The petitioner admits her signature on all the dishonoured cheques. Her specific defence is that she did not borrow money and on the other hand, the cheques issued by her were misused by the respondents. But the Trial Court has given a finding that since ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ial Court. His further submission is that petitioner has been in custody for the last two years serving the default sentence and she may be released from custody extending the benefit under Section 428 of Code of Criminal Procedure. I do not think that this submission of Shri P.N. Hegde can be accepted. Section 428 of Cr.P.C. deals with setting off the period spent by an offender in jail. 5. Th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
