2022 (5) TMI 892

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lagged by the Risk Management Strategy of the Income Tax Department - also detailed replies of the Petitioner-Company were not taken into consideration by Respondent No.1, and therefore, the Order under Section 148A(d) and the consequential Notice under Section 148 of the Act should be set aside - HELD THAT:- On the last date of hearing respondent-revenue had sought time to obtain instructions. To .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... replies.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA For the Petitioner : Mr.P.Roychaudhuri, Advocate with Mr.Gagan Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. O R D E R Present writ petition has been filed challenging the notice dated 31st March, 2022 issued by Respondent No.1 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act (in short 'the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... aside. On the last date of hearing, Mr.Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent-revenue had sought time to obtain instructions. Today, he prays for further time to obtain instructions. However, this Court is of the view that the respondent-revenue has had adequate time to obtain instructions. Consequently, this Court has no other option but to believe the averments in the writ petition. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X