9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (4) TMI 1927X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that the subject property, which was brought for auction, was owned by the defaulter namely M/s. DDS Steel Rolling Mills Private Limited and not the said M/s. SDS Steels Private Limited and the said M/s. Jai Bhawani Steel Enterprises - who is the actual owner of property attached? HELD THAT:- The petitioner requested the Customs Authorities to lift the attachment and in this regard, a represen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ccordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. - Writ Petition No. 10457 of 2018 - - - Dated:- 25-4-2018 - ORDER Mr. Rabu Manohar, learned Senior Standing Counsel accepts notice for the respondent. Heard both. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The subject property was originally owned by one M/s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... c auction and was declared as a successful bidder and a sale certificate was issued on 23.1.2012. Subsequently, a corrigendum was issued since there was no mentioning of the pathway. The petitioner approached the Sub-Registrar, Redhills for registration of the sale certificate along with the corrigendum. However, the petitioner was informed that there was an attachment of the subject property by t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 5.10.2017 and 25.10.2017. Having not been favoured with any response, the petitioner is before this Court for appropriate directions to the respondent. The fact that the petitioner has made a representation for lifting the attachment is not in dispute, as the Department, by letter dated 16.10.2017, requested for details from the petitioner, which the petitioner has furnished. 5. In the light of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
