9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (2) TMI 1375X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 03 is produced - violation of principles of natural justice - HELD THAT:- It is to be pointed out that though an opportunity of personal hearing was granted, the impugned order does not reflect as to how and in what manner the public notice No.69/2004-09 dated 07.04.2005 is not applicable to the petitioner and in what way still the petitioner has to satisfy the recognition for the base year. Ther ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Joseph Prabakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.D.Vijayakumar, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the respondents and perused the material available on record. 2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned proceedings dated 27.02.2012 by which the petitioner's application for issuance of Duty Credit under the DFCE Scheme was refused to be considered on the ground tha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -07, it is provided that the scheme will be applicable to the status holders who were also the status holders as on 31.03.2003 and who had achieved the minimum turnover of Rs.25 crores in the year 2003-04. An amendment was issued by a Public Notice No.69/2004-09 dated 07.04.2005, by which paragraph 3.2.6-A was amended stating that the scheme will be applicable to the Status Holders/Star Export Hou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the Grievance Redressal Committee. In spite of the several representations, nothing happened till 2012 and the impugned order has been passed on 27.02.2012. 5. Learned Central Government Standing Counsel would submit that an opportunity of personal hearing was granted to the petitioner before the impugned order is passed. 6. It is to be pointed out that though an opportunity of personal h ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
