9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (5) TMI 28X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s Court for clarification – demurrage charges for this period are not justified as the goods were retained by the department in spite of orders passed by this Court to release the goods - Commissioner of Customs (Port), is directed to pay cost - 1018 of 2007 - - - Dated:- 9-5-2008 - Ashok Bhan and Dalveer Bhandari, JJ. S/Shri Mohan Parasaran, ASG, Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj for B. Krishna Prasad, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ) has not released the said consignments. 3. We were annoyed to know that in spite of Court's orders, goods had not been released. On 25th April, 2008, this Court issued a notice to the Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkatta to show cause as to why he should not be punished under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 as he has failed to comply with the directions issued by this Court. He was also ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eleased on payment of demurrage charges which include the period from the date of passing the order i.e. 7-1-2008 till the date of releasing the goods to the assessee i.e. 3-5-2008. The demurrage charges for this period are not justified as the goods were retained by the department in spite of orders passed by this Court to release the goods. On a query put to Mr. Mohan Parasaran, learned Addition ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
