9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (8) TMI 770X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ndents without considering the judgment rendered by this Court in HIRA SINGH ANR. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA ANR. [ 2017 (7) TMI 1427 - SUPREME COURT] ? HELD THAT:- The above question was answered by the three-Judge Bench in Hira Singh and Another v. Union of India Another [ 2020 (4) TMI 671 - SUPREME COURT] , where it was held that In case of seizure of mixture of Narcotic Drugs or Psychotr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hri B. Krishna Prasad, AOR, Ms. V. Mohana, Sr. Advocate, M.K. Maroria, Harish Pandey, Akshay Amritanshu and Manish, Advocates, for the Petitioner. Shri R. Chandrachud, AOR, M. Karpagavinayagam, Sr. Advocate, D. Venketa Krishna and S.I. Abdul Kalam Bagadur Sha, Advocates, for the Respondent. ORDER The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. 2. Leave granted. 3. The instant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Although service is complete on respondent Nos. 1 and 2 yet, no one has appeared on their behalf. 6. Heard Learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the appellant as also the Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 3. 7. Not agreeing with the view taken by this Court in the case of E. Micheal Raj v. Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau (Crimina ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (s) is not to be excluded and to be taken into consideration along with actual content by weight of the offending drug, while determining the small or commercial quantity of the Narcotic Drugs or Psychotropic Substances. 9. In view of the above, we are of the considered view that ends of justice would be met if the impugned order passed by the High Court granting bail to the respondents here ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
