2008 (2) TMI 221

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e not taken the proper precaution to safeguard the goods, is not justified – Assessee’s appeal is allowed - E/1279/2006-SM(BR) - 498/2008-SM(BR)(PB), - Dated:- 26-2-2008 - Shri P.K. Das, Member (J) Shri Hemant Bajaj, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri A.K. Rastogi, DR, for the Respondent. [Order] - The appellant filed this appeal against the rejection of application for remission o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dara reported in 2007 (212) E.L.T. 558 (Tri.-Del.) held that the seized goods are unfit for human consumption or marketing, rejection of remission application n the ground that the applicant had not taken proper safeguard is extraneous. 3. In view of the above, I set-aside the impugned order and appeal is allowed with consequential relief. (Order dictated pronounced in open court on 21-2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X