9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (9) TMI 1206X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pondent No.2, who is stated to be 92 years old) will join the enquiries-cuminvestigation in-person as and when required; (ii) If respondent No.2 is also required to join enquiry, it is directed that keeping in view his age, he shall be permitted to do so through online mode as already directed by the High Court; (iii) Respondent Nos.1-7 undertake not to seek refund of Rs.28 crores from the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Mr. Anjani Kumar Rai, Adv. Mr. Ajay Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Wejo Khalu, Adv. Mrs. B. Sunita Rao, AOR Mr. G.Mann, Adv. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, AAG Mr. Sarvesh Singh Baghel, AOR Mr. B.N. Dubey, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Kakkar, Adv ORDER 1. Leave granted. 2. Feeling aggrieved by the impugned order dated 15.09.2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Misc.Bail Application No.103 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nts. 4. We have heard Mr. Suryaprakash V.Raju, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the appellants as also Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 7. 5. Having regard to the rival contentions, we are of the view that the impugned order passed by the High Court deserves to be partly modified in the following terms: ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
