2022 (10) TMI 661

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Keeping in view the fact that Petitioner s representation dated 11th July, 2022 has not been decided till date, the present writ petition along with pending application is disposed of with a direction to the Respondent No.2 to decide the Petitioner s detailed representation dated 11th July, 2022 by way of a reasoned order in accordance with law within eight weeks. In the event, the Petitioner is a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tioner on 14th November, 2017, but without any interest. He states that after the Allahabad High Court quashed the search assessment, the principal amount of Rs.3,38,00,000/- as seized by the Income Tax Department was appropriated by the Department on 13th April, 2017 as tax paid towards regular assessment for the Assessment Year 2013-14 as evident from Form 26AS. He also states that under the Sec .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Petitioner s detailed representation dated 11th July, 2022 by way of a reasoned order in accordance with law within eight weeks. In the event, the Petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of the Respondent No.2, the Petitioner shall be at liberty to file appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. However, this Court clarifies that it has not commented on the merits of the controversy. The rig .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X