9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (10) TMI 955X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2 (2) TMI 933 - MADRAS HIGH COURT ] and the Revenue/Department has also accepted the said view as evident from the fact that no appeal has been filed in any of the matters, this Court intends to follow the above order of this Court. This Court feels that the benefit extended by this Court in the earlier orders referred in Suguna Cutpiece Centre's case , may be extended to the Petitioner - Petition disposed off. - W.P.(MD)No.21741 of 2022 And W.M.P.(MD)No.15905 and 15910 of 2022 - - - Dated:- 27-9-2022 - Honourable Mr.Justice Mohammed Shaffiq For the Petitioner : Mr.A.Srinivasan For the Respondents : Mr.T.Amjadkhan Government Advocate ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order of cancella ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ated filing of returns for the defaulted period under the provisions of the Act, within a period of forty five (45) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if it has not been already paid. ii. It is made clear that such payment of Tax, Interest, fine / fee and etc. shall not be allowed to be made or adjusted from and out of any Input Tax Credit which may be lying unutilized or unclaimed in the hands of these petitioners. iii. If any Input Tax Credit has remained utilized, it shall not be utilised until it is scrutinized and approved by an appropriate or a competent officer of the Department. iv. Only such approved Input Tax Credit shall be allowed for being utilized thereafter for discharging future tax liabili ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... viz., a) M/s.Maaruthi Foundations Private Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner (ST) (FAC), reported in 2022 (5) TMI 405 b) J.Jayakrishnan Vs The Additional Chief Secretary/Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Chennai reported in 2022 (7) TMI 1226 c) TVL.Jeyalakshmi Store represented by its Proprietor, Sivanu Pandian Vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes reported in 2022 (7) TMI 1275 d) M/s.Pearl and Company Vs The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes in W.P(MD)No.19127 of 2022. 4. In view of the fact that this Court has been consistently following the directions issued in the case of Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Vs Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST) and others (W.P.Nos.25048, 25877, 12738 of 2021 etc., batch) an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
