9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (11) TMI 38X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... STA GANJU Petitioner Through: Mr Puneet Agarwal with Mr Yuvraj Singh and Mr Chetan Kumar Shukla, Advs. Respondents Through: Mr Rajeev Aggarwal with Ms Shilpa Singh and Ms Divyanshi Bansal, Advs. [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (Oral): CM Appl.43862/2022 1. Allowed, subject to the petitioner filing legible copies of dim documents, at least three days before the next date of hearing. W.P.(C) 14366/2022 CM Appl.43861/2022 [Application filed on behalf of the petitioner for interim relief] 2. Issue notice. 2.1. Mr Rajeev Aggarwal accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final heari ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ideration; and/or ix. Issue any other writ, order or direction in favour of the Petitioner, as this Hon ble Court may deem fit and proper in the present facts and circumstances of the case, so as to ensure the ends of justice, or else the Petitioner shall suffer irreparably; and/or x. to grant costs of this Petition; and/or 5. Mr Puneet Agrawal, who appears on behalf of the petitioner, says that he does not wish to press the prayer made for costs, i.e., prayer clause (x). 5.1. The statement of Mr Agrawal is taken on record. 6. Insofar as the remaining substantive prayers are concerned, it is not disputed that the issues raised in the instant matter are similar to those raised in certain other matters, in which directio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ted to release F Forms to enable appropriate corrections to be made for the concerned period. 3.1. It is made clear that this direction will remain suspended, till a decision is rendered in SLP(C.) No.13928/2018, and will be subject to the final decision of the Supreme Court in that case 8. Somewhat similar directions have been issued by another Division Bench comprising Hon ble Mr Justice S. Ravindra Bhat [as he then was] and Hon ble Mr Justice A.K. Chawla [as he then was], in W.P.(C) No. 9474/2018, titled Allied Automation Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Trade Taxes. 8.1. The directions contained in the M/s R. B. Santani case are based on, as would be evident, those contained in Allied Automation En ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
