2019 (11) TMI 1767

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... been preferred by the Appellant within 30 days from the date of knowledge, the appeal is not barred by limitation. However, as the default took place in the year 2012, the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Bench-III, New Delhi rightly held that the application under Section 9 of the I B Code was barred by limitation and mere issuance of raising the bill after long delay, the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d Justice Venugopal M. Member (Judicial) For the Appellant: Mr. Alok Tripathi, Advocate For the Respondent: Ms. Mehak Suri, Advocate ORDER Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the free copy of the impugned order was not supplied to the Appellant and there is no delay in filing the appeal if it is counted from the date of knowledge. It is further submitted that t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ional Creditor cannot take advantage of the claim. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant submits that the Appellant is ready to move before the competent Forum for appropriate relief but the cost as imposed is uncalled for. We are of the opinion that if the application under Section 9 was time barred, while dismissing the application, the Adjudicating Authority should not ha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X