Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2014 (1) TMI 1926

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is to be shown by the applicant that any illegality or perversity is done by the trial Court in passing the impugned order. The learned counsel for the applicant could not show that any illegality or perversity was done by the trial Court in passing such order and therefore, on factual position only, the revisions filed by the applicants cannot be accepted. The revisions filed by the applicants are hereby dismissed. - CRIMINAL REVISION NOS. 1831 AND 1832/2012 - - - Dated:- 21-1-2014 - N.K. GUPTA, J. For the Appellant : Shri Amit Singh Handa For the Respondent : None ORDER N.K. Gupta, J. 1. Both the revisions are connected with the same parties in a matter of similar nature and therefore, decided by a common .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nsel for the applicant only. 5. It appears that the applicant could file the revision applications before the Sessions Court concerned. However, he filed the revisions before this Court directly. It is the duty of the party to knock the door of the lowest Court first, so that being aggrieved with the order of that Court, a petition under section 482 of the Cr.P.C. may be filed before this Court. However, for a criminal revision, there is a concurrent jurisdiction of this Court as well as the Sessions Court and therefore, this Court cannot refuse to hear the criminal revisions filed by the applicant. 6. So far as the merits of the case is concerned, the learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that no such document could be soug .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , which was mentioned on the cheques was not due towards the applicant and he could not get his complaints succeeded. If a person claims that a huge amount is lent to another person then to show his case, he has to prove that he had the status to lent a huge amount to anyone. It is for the applicant to produce the documents or file an affidavit that he never filed any income tax return in income tax department or he never kept any account books of his transaction, still he is liable to file the copy of bank accounts of last two years as required by the accused. 8. For acceptance of a revision, it is to be shown by the applicant that any illegality or perversity is done by the trial Court in passing the impugned order. The learned counsel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates