Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (7) TMI 1380

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... that the assessee has belatedly submitted relevant Form No. 27C collected from its buyers. The same were placed on record before the Assessing Officer itself who declined to accept the same in view of delay in submission thereof. There is no issue qua genuineness of these Forms. Thus, the Gujarat High Court held that addition with the aid of section 206C could not be made. In the case of CIT vs. Chhaganbhai K Sanghani [ 2018 (5) TMI 1093 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] held that where in case of assessee, a dealer in scrap, AO levied interest and tax in terms of section 206C(7) on account of non-collection of tax source, in view of fact that asssessee had submitted certificates provided by buyers under sub-section (1A) if section 206C before app .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ub-sections (6) and (6A) and of the Act for not collecting tax at source of Rs. 19,44,877 on sale of scrap and consequently also erred in confirming the levy of interest of Rs. Rs, 13,07,620/- u/s 206C (7) of the Act. 2. The Commissioner of lncome-tax (Appeals)-NFAC has erred in confirming the order of the ITO-TDS-I, Rajkot holding that the appellant-assessee was in default, merely for the reason that the Form 27C prescribed in Rules was not submitted by the appellant- assessee to the office of CCIT/CIT within the prescribed time limit by failing to appreciate that submission of Form 27C was held the jurisdictional high court to be a procedural requirement. 3. The Commissioner of lncome-tax (Appeals)-NFAC has erred in law and on facts .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... inference that he is an assessee-in - default . Further, the assessee had submitted Form 27BA (issued by chartered accountant) which evidences that these buyers have filed return of income and in such a return of income they have reflected the purchases from the assessee and further paid income tax due on the returned income. Further, he submitted that AO has erred in holding that non-submission of Form Number 27C in prescribed time was a mandatory requirement of law, by ignoring the jurisdictional judicial precedents on the subject. The Ld. CIT(Appeals) dismissed the appeal of the assessee with the following observations: 1.5.2] Legal position as on date: I have carefully perused the order passed u/s 206C(6), 206C(6A) 206C(7) of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of being heard has not been accorded to it as it failed to prove its contention at 3 stages namely during (i) during TDS spot Survey stage, (ii) Post TDS Survey enquiry stage and (iii) finally during appellate stage. Accordingly after duly considering assessee's submission and taking a note of factual matrix of the case, AO's action in treating it as assessee in default of TCS and raising following demand is hereby sustained. 4. Before us, the counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee company did not collect TCS under the bona-fide belief that assessee purchasing parties were manufacturers and hence, it was not under an obligation to collect TCS. He further submitted that filing of form 27C is a procedural require .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... who declined to accept the same in view of delay in submission thereof. There is no issue qua genuineness of these Forms. The co-ordinate Bench decision of Tribunal in case of Bharti Metals already holds that such a belated submission of relevant Form is a procedural lapse only . The Revenue is unable to point any distinction on facts or law therein. Thus, the Gujarat High Court held that addition with the aid of section 206C could not be made. In the case of CIT vs. Chhaganbhai K Sanghani, [2018] 94 taxmann.com 459 (Gujarat High Court ) held that where in case of assessee, a dealer in scrap, AO levied interest and tax in terms of section 206C(7) on account of non-collection of tax source, in view of fact that asssessee had submitted ce .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates