9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (3) TMI 243X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eal which was disposed of way back on 14.05.2019 in the case of SUPERNA DHAWAN ANR VERSUS BHARTI DEFENCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. ORS [ 2019 (5) TMI 1969 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI] . The present application is not maintainable and being totally mis-conceived is thus hereby dismissed. - I.A. No. 296 of 2023 In Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 195 of 2019 - - - Dated:- 22-2-2023 - [ Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain ] Member ( Judicial ) And [ Mr. Naresh Salecha ] Member ( Technical ) For the Appellants : Mr. Praveen Chaturvedi Ms. Jyoti Chaturvedi , Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Sumesh Dhawan , Mr. Anupam Prakash Mr. Vasu Manchanda , Adv. JUDGMENT Per : Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain : ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the Corporate Debtor. 5. The order dated 14.01.2019 was challenged in appeal i.e. CA (AT) (Ins) No. 195 of 2019 by Superna Dhawan and Vikas Dhawan, shareholders of the BDIL. The said appeal was disposed of on 14.05.2019. 6. The Liquidator filed I.A. No. 3702 of 2019 in CP (IB) No. 292/MB/2017 for further directions in the liquidation process and the sale of assets of the Corporate Debtor. The said application was allowed by the Adjudicating Authority on 18.12.2020. 7. The order dated 18.12.2020 was challenged by the present Applicant i.e. Bharatiya Kamgar Sena (Worker Union) by way of CA (AT) (Ins) No. 243 of 2021. Similarly, the same order passed in M.A. No. 3720 of 2019 was challenged in CA (AT) (Ins) No. 140 of 2021 by Praka ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... view the requirements of Section 35(1)(e) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 as also the requirements of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016. We do not find any question of law worth consideration in this appeal, now at this juncture and at the instance of the appellants. The appeal stands dismissed. All pending applications stand disposed of. 9. The order passed in Civil Appeal No. 1723 of 2022 read as under:- Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and having perused the material placed on record, we are not persuaded to consider interference in this matter, particularly when it is noticed that the employees are a part of the Stakeholders Commit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
