2008 (8) TMI 139

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ibunal – held that a speaking order having been passed, after full hearing, rightly or wrongly, the remedy of the applicant was/is by way of a writ petition, in the High Court - and the subsequent order of the co-ordinate Bench cannot be a ground for review of the order. In the circumstances, application is rejected
Justice S.N. Jha, President and Shri M. Veeraiyan, Member (T) Shri P.K. Sahu w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Tri.-Ahmd.), which was not taken into consideration. We may clarify here that the decision in M/s. Jyoti Limited was rendered by a third member of difference of opinion between two Members. Strictly speaking therefore, it may not be said to be a decision of a three Member Bench. However, our attention in this regard, was drawn on decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of P.C. Puri v. Commiss .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X