TMI Blog2022 (7) TMI 1411X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he petitioner s dealer in its regular course of business - impugned adjudication order dated 1st September, 2011 was further challenged before the three forum i.e. before the appellate authority, revisional authority and thereafter by way of review and all the four authorities below considering the materials/documents produced before them did not accept the claim of the petitioner. HELD THAT:- ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... indings of the authorities below. Petition dismissed. - W.P.A. 7307 of 2019 - - - Dated:- 6-7-2022 - Md. Nizamuddin, J. For the Petitioner : Mr. Prithu Dudhoria. For the State :Mr. A. Ray, Mr. S. Mukherjee, Mr. D. Ghosh. ORDER Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order of the review dated 10th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... review and all the four authorities below considering the materials/documents produced before them did not accept the claim of the petitioner. It is not a case in this writ petition that the impugned orders were passed either in violation of principle of natural justice by denying the petitioner any opportunity of hearing before the authorities or the impugned orders have been passed by the author ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|