9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (12) TMI 1445X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eedings also pending and that the complainant and family members of the complainant are stated to be on interim protection till 04.12.2021 - it is considered appropriate that the applicants be not arrested till the date 06.12.2021 by which date they may move the requisite applications before the Court concerned subject to the conditions to the effect that they shall join the investigation of the case in relation to FIR No.435/2021, PS Model Town, Panipat, Haryana, shall keep their mobile phones on at all times and shall drop their PIN on the google map to ensure that their locations are available to the Investigating Officer. The application is disposed of accordingly. - BAIL APPLN. 4260/2021 & CRL.M.A. 19290-19291/2021 - - - Dated:- 2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... le offences punishable under Sections 406/420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which the petitioners submit have been deliberately incorporated with it inter alia also having been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the despite the complainant, the spouse of the petitioner no.1 being a resident of Saharanpur as per his ID proof in the form of Aadhar Card, copy of which has been placed on record as Annexure-P7 to the present petition, the said complainant has chosen to get the FIR registered at Panipat, Haryana where he is stated to having alleged political influence. On behalf of the State of the NCT of Delhi, it is submitted by the learned APP for the State that two days of transit anticipatory bail would suffice to meet the ends ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e of NCT of Delhi and Ors. in Bail Appl. No.4173/2021 and in Himanshu Yadav Vs. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors. in Bail Appl. No.4174/2021 decided on 25.11.2021, in as much as, it has been categorically observed in the observations in Capt. Satish Kumar Sharma (supra) adhered to by this Court in Harmeet Singh, Devya Singh and Himanshu Yadav (supra) to the effect that there is nothing in Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. which restricts the jurisdiction of the High Court or Court of Sessions in relation to the aspect of grant of transit anticipatory bail and that an appropriate Court within whose jurisdiction the FIR is registered though also has concurrent jurisdiction to grant bail to the person concerned, the Court at the place where the appli ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
