9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (6) TMI 1255X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... itioner is that when the petitioner had already filed application seeking certain rectification giving three clear reasons and found no response - without issuing any notice on the pending application under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 seeking rectification, ex-parte order passed - HELD THAT:- The learned Additional Government Pleader (T) is unable to support the impugne ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... seph Prabakar For the Respondent : Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai Additional Government Pleader (T) ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 31.03.2015 passed by the Deputy Commissioner (C.T)-II, Large Tax Payers Unit, Chennai on the ground that the same has been passed against the provisions of law and in gross violation of the principles of natural just ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... xcess reporting had taken place under three heads. Firstly, it was explained that the major mistake was due to inadvertant inclusion of VAT amount of Rs.8,30,16,165/- separately charged in the sale bills without including the sale price on the sale of tractors in the total and taxable turnover while filing returns. Secondly, the credit notes raised for Rs.11,00,025/- in respect of cancelled invoic ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... fication giving three clear reasons and finding no response he has come to this Court by filing writ petition and this Court also by order dated 26.04.2011 directed the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner, but unfortunately the respondent, without issuing any notice on the pending application under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 seeking rectification, wrongly ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
