Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

REVERSAL OF IGST ITC AND PAYMENT THROUGH DRC 03

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Sir, I have a query one client has received ASMT 10 wherein department has asked clarification of IGST differance amount of 125000 between GSTR 3B and 2A of F.Y. 2017-18. After verification we found accountant has erroneously taken IGST excess to the extent 125000 in IGST Column. Now while reversing and making payment through DRC 03 it is asking state name against IGST. Just wanted to know which state to select since it was erroneously taken and also use of DRC 03 is correct challen. your valuable guidence will help us to proceed further. Thanks in Advance - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Sh.Santosh Patil Ji, You should reverse in GSTR-3B in Table 4 against serial no. B (2)--Others under the column meant for IGST and NOT via Form GST .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... DRC-03 . F orm GST DRC-03 is the last resort. Thus Common Portal System will not ask for the name of State. The department is concerned with reversal along with interest. It is not necessary that you should pay through Form GST DRC-03 . Since Form GST ASMT-10 has already been issued, whether to accept explanation or not, is discretion of the Proper Officer as per Rule 99 (3) of CGST Rules . If reversal is made through Form GSTR 3 B , it will not have adverse effect. - Reply By Amit Agrawal - The Reply = My views: A. Return in Form GSTR-3B cannot be used now for paying against wrongly availed ITC in FY 2017-18. B. Form DRC-03 should be used for paying subject liability. C. Place of supply (POS) should be 'the state/union territory' w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... here you are registered, while paying against wrongly availed ITC under the head of 'IGST'. These are ex facie views of mine and the same should not be construed as professional advice/suggestion. - Reply By GUNASEKARAN K - The Reply = The taxpayer is required to pay the tax amount mentioned in GST ASMT-10 along with interest and penalty. Payment must be done through Form DRC-03 . While making payment, the assessee should select the correct section (ITC Mismatch - GSTR 2A / 2B to GSTR 3B for your case) Amount payable in GST DRC-03 can be paid through ITC or in cash . Also need to file reply in Form GST ASMT-11 that amount mentioned in GST ASMT-10 has been paid along with copy of GST DRC-03 . The state must be same as state registere .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d by the assessee. - Reply By GUNASEKARAN K - The Reply = In continuation to above reply; The Proper Officer will issue an order under GST ASMT-12 that reply is found satisfactory and corresponding proceedings have been dropped. - Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani - The Reply = In one of the case the department has accepted the reversal of excess claimed input tax credit through GSTR 3B . - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani Ji, Pl. post the case law here. - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Both modes of payment are legally valid and correct inasmuch as both are prescribed in CGST Act /Rules. The major difference between the two modes is that in DRC-03 no separate intimation is required to be given to the Proper Officer wh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ereas if payment or reversal is made through GSTR 3 B via Electronic Credit Ledger and Electronic Cash Ledger, separate intimation is required to be given as proof of payment. Moreover, DRC-03 mode of payment is more convenient for the purpose of Audit, Adjudication, Inspection etc. - Reply By Amit Agrawal - The Reply = In continuation of my post earliest post at serial No. 2 above, please note the restrictions put u/s 39 (9) of the CGST Act, 2017 which reads as under: 11 [ Where ] any registered person after furnishing a return under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) or sub-section (4) or sub-section (5) discovers any omission or incorrect particulars therein , other than as a result of scrutiny, audit, inspection or en .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... forcement activity by the tax authorities , he shall rectify such omission or incorrect particulars 5 [ in such form and manner as may be perscribed ] , subject to payment of interest under this Act: Provided that no such rectification of any omission or incorrect particulars shall be allowed after 12 [ the thirtieth day of November ] following 6 [ the end of the financial year to which such details pertain ] , or the actual date of furnishing of relevant annual return, whichever is earlier . These are ex facie views of mine and the same should not be construed as professional advice/suggestion. - Reply By KUMAR Narasimhan - The Reply = Dear Amit Sir, So, you mean to say that in case of IGST tax incorrectly taken, in the case of POS is unkn .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... own we can use the respective state of GST registration of the tax payer? - Reply By Amit Agrawal - The Reply = Dear Shri Kumar Narasimhan, If tax-payer takes ITC against IGST, this is with the understanding that the place of underlying supply is the place where such tax-payer is registered. In other words, If tax-payer takes ITC against IGST, it is with the understanding that state / UT where such tax-payer is registered, has got underlying tax-revenue in form of IGST. For subject query under discussion here, tax-payer has taken ITC of IGST even though there was no underlying inter-supply involving place of supply as that of registered place of the tax-payer. In other words, place of supply has not got revenue in form of IGST even though t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ax-payer has taken credit against non-existent supply at place of his registration. Hence, I have suggested to show the place of supply (POS) as 'the state/union territory' where the tax-payer is registered, while paying against wrongly availed ITC under the head of 'IGST'. These are ex facie views of mine and the same should not be construed as professional advice/suggestion. - Reply By Padmanathan Kollengode - The Reply = I had opportunity to discuss this matter at great length with Amit ji. He has done extensive research on the same and I fully agree with his views. - Reply By KUMAR Narasimhan - The Reply = Dear Sir, Thank you so much for giving me more clarity on this Subject. - Reply By Gaurav Gupta - The Reply = What s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hould be the Place of Supply for IGST payment, where there is difference in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B , and the short tax paid in R-3B is not identifiable. - REVERSAL OF IGST ITC AND PAYMENT THROUGH DRC 03 - Query Started By: - SANTOSH PATIL Dated:- 26-8-2023 Last Replied Date:- 26-3-2024 Goods and Services Tax - GST - Got 13 Replies - GST - Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing, reply post by an expert, personal opinion Tax Management India - taxmanagementindia - taxmanagement - taxmanagementindia.com - TMI - TaxTMI - TMITax .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates