2013 (5) TMI 1067

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dv., Mr. Arun Kumar Beriwal, Adv. ORDER 1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. We have perused the impugned order as well as the entire record. In our opinion, the appellants have raised substantial questions of law in the proceeding before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission. However, the order passed by the Member on 2nd September, 2009 merely states th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... important quasi judicial functions. The orders passed by the Commission and the Appellate Tribunal can have far reaching consequences. Therefore, the minimum that is required of the Commission as well as the Appellate Tribunal is that the orders are supported by reasons, even briefly. However, the impugned orders are bereft of any reasons in support of the conclusions. We are, therefore, constrai .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nclined to examine the issues raised by the parties on merits, in view of the order proposed. Without going into the merits of the issues involved, we deem it appropriate to set aside the orders impugned only on the ground that they do not disclose the reasons for the conclusions reached. 7. In view of the above, the appeals are allowed, the matters are remanded back to the Competition Appellat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X