9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (4) TMI 1634X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... terial custody should be included or excluded in completing the period of 60 days or 90 days for statutory bail? - HELD THAT:- On going through the judgment of RAVI PRAKASH SINGH VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR [ 2015 (2) TMI 1371 - SUPREME COURT] , one can see that the case CHAGANTI SATYANARAYAN VERSUS STATE OF AP. [ 1986 (5) TMI 265 - SUPREME COURT] has been considered by the Hon ble Apex Court and in p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on 167(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Thus, there is no merit in the petition and it deserves to be dismissed - petition dismissed. - S.B. SHUKRE, J. For the Appellant : Shri C.B. Barve, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri J.Y. Ghurde, Additional Public Prosecutor ORAL JUDGMENT : S.B. SHUKRE, J 1. Heard. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. 3. Heard ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... down in the case of Ravi Prakash Singh alias Arvind Singh Vs. State of Bihar, reported in (2015) 8 SCC 340, the Hon ble Apex Court has held that the date on which the accused is sent to the judicial custody must be excluded in computing such a period. 6. On going through the judgment of Ravi Prakash Singh, one can see that the case Chaganti Satyanarayans and others has been considered by the Ho ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
