9911796707
TMI Blog1989 (4) TMI 341X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... A' to the writ petition, was issued in respect of certain wrongful acts alleged to have been committed by the petitioner. 3. An enquiry ensued in which the petitioner was found guilty of the charges levelled against him. The report of the enquiry has been annexed to the writ petition marked with the letter 'F'. 4. On the basis of the enquiry, an order of removal from service was passed against the petitioner. The order of punishment has been annexed to the writ petition marked with the letter 'G'. 5. Against the order of punishment, the petitioner preferred an appeal which was rejected by the Appellate Authority by an order passed on 5th October, 1982. This order has also been annexed to the writ petition marked with ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e of action' as is well known means every fact which if traversed, it would be necessary for the plaintiff to prove in order to support his right to a judgment of the court. 10. In other words it is bundle of facts which taken with the law applicable to the case gives the plaintiff a right to relief against the defendant. 11. In the instant case the bundle of facts, as stated in the petition, relates to the proceedings of the enquiry, the order of punishment and the order on appeal, none of which occurred within the territorial jurisdiction of this court. I have already stated that neither the competency nor the allegations made in the charge sheet has been challenged in the writ petition. Although in the prayer portion there is a pra ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Supreme Court. 14. Mr. Sanyal has also referred to a very recent decision of the Division Bench of this court in Pottery Mazdoor Panchayat and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. reported in 1989(1) CLJ 324. The facts of this case are entirely different and has no manner of application to the instant proceeding. In the aforesaid case the Head Office of the respondent company itself was situated within the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court at Calcutta whereof all policy decisions originated and the prayers were made in the said case for directing the respondent company, which had its Head Office at Calcutta, to give effect to a certain order. In the instant writ petition the facts, as I have already held, are entirely different and the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
