TMI Blog2024 (4) TMI 48X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2 - HELD THAT:- The petitioner is entitled to duty drawback to the tune of Rs. 4,97,202/- in respect of the aforesaid shipping bills corresponding to the exported goods to the value of Rs. 66,11,867/-. However, at the time of consideration, the petitioner was not in a position to submit a statement of bank realization. The claim of the petitioner was also rejected on the ground that he had not pro ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ndamus, to quash the impugned order dated 22-9-2020 passed by the 1st respondent in Order-in-Original No. 829 of 2020, and the consequent impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent, dated 16-2-2023 as illegal and consequently, to direct the 3rd respondent to defreeze the petitioner's bank account within the time that may be stipulated by this Court. 2. The petitioner is a partnership firm engaged ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ding to the exported goods to the value of Rs. 66,11,867/-. However, at the time of consideration, the petitioner was not in a position to submit a statement of bank realization. The claim of the petitioner was also rejected on the ground that he had not produced the bank realization certificate. Now, the petitioner is before this Court. In the type set, the petitioner has enclosed the bank realiz ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|