2012 (4) TMI 830

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s taken up 12 grounds in this appeal in which the order of the Ld. CIT(A) has been challenged in respect of various additions and disallowances upheld by him. Ground No. 7 is to the effect that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in not accepting additional evidence under rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules 1962, whereas he has accepted only a part of additional evidence. In pursuance of this ground, an application .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... v Aggarwal was ill, the assessee could have informed the AO about this fact so that he could wait for his return. This was evidently not done. Consequently the AO proceeded to make the assessment on the basis of facts and record. In these circumstances, the additional evidence was not admitted. Further, he referred to the remand report submitted by the AO, placed in the paper book from pages Nos. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... evidence was not taken on record and the appeal was decided on the basis of evidence on the record of the AO. Further he accepted the submission that Shri Keshav Aggarwal, Counsel, was physically indisposed during the relevant period as per certificate issued by Dr. V.K. Goel. The only thing which happened is that nobody on behalf of the assessee company informed the AO about the inability of Shr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X