9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (11) TMI 1821X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al Court was not specifically raised. However, it is well settled that challenge to a Lok Adalat award can only be on limited grounds and such a challenge would lie only before the High Court by way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution [see STATE OF PUNJAB ANR. VERSUS JALOUR SINGH ORS. [ 2008 (1) TMI 960 - SUPREME COURT] and BHARGAVI CONSTRUCTIONS ANR. VERSUS KOTHAKAPU MUTHYAM ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he said suit was filed by the first respondent herein for a declaration that she was the owner in possession of the suit scheduled land situated at Village Maheshwari, Tehsil and District Rewari, and that the defendants in the suit had no right, title or interest over the same. She sought a further declaration that the compromise dated 13.08.2013 and the Award bearing null, void and not binding up ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . Shri Ajay Jain, learned counsel, would contend that even if it was the case of the first respondent/plaintiff that the Award was secured from the Lok Adalat by playing fraud, her remedy would lie elsewhere as the civil Court would have no jurisdiction to entertain and adjudicate upon such a plea. He would place reliance on case law in support of his contention. Perusal of the order under revisio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
