TMI Blog2024 (6) TMI 369X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... years of passing of such assessment/re-assessment orders - HELD THAT:- Though the respondent has not filed any counter affidavit, there are no merits in the present Writ Petition as the petitioner has suffered assessment/re-assessment orders for the Assessment Years 2003-04, 2004-05, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09 2009-10 but did not choose to file any appeal before the Appellate Authority in time. Th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... where, the petitioner was in arrears of tax for the periods 2003-04, 2004-05, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09 2009-10, for a sum of Rs. 65,06,654/- as detailed below:- Sl. No Year of Demand Demand Tax Penalty Total 1 2003-04 Rs. 65,834/- 0 Rs. 65,834/- 2 2004-05 Rs. 18,61,706/- Rs. 19,72,734/- Rs. 38,34,440/- 3 2006-07 Rs. 6,82,376/- 0 Rs. 6,82,376/- 4 2007-08 Rs. 1,00,204/- 0 Rs. 1,00,204/- 5 2008-09 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssments orders dated 31.12.2008 and 29.06.2012 were passed for the periods 2003-04 and 2004-05, and CST original assessment orders were passed exparte for the periods 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10 confirming the demand of Rs. 65,06,655/-. 6. It is submitted that the above assessment/re-assessment orders were not sent to its new address at Madurai despite the change of address being intimat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|