The petition is dismissed as an alternative efficacious remedy is available to challenge the impugned...

The petition is dismissed as an alternative efficacious remedy is available to challenge the impugned order u/s 107 of the GST Act. While violation of natural justice and vires of Section 16(2)(c) are grounds to entertain the writ, disputed questions of fact regarding opportunity of hearing and composite invocation of Section 16(2)(b) and 16(2)(c) necessitate thorough analysis, precluding interference at this stage. The petitioner can raise contentions on merits, including interpretation of Section 16(2)(b) read with Rule 36 and Section 155, before the Appellate Authority u/s 107. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X