Arecanut classification under CTH 21069030 challenged - ...

Importers challenge arecanut classification; Court remits case for fresh order after finding lack of opportunity.

Case Laws Customs

September 18, 2024

Arecanut classification under CTH 21069030 challenged - provisional release of imported consignment - petitioner claims violation of natural justice as not heard before impugned order - Court holds petitioner uncooperative by not filing reply or attending hearing - impugned order appealable u/s 128 of Customs Act requiring 7.5% duty deposit - balancing interests, impugned order set aside, matter remitted to pass fresh order on merits in accordance with law.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Arecanut classification under CTH 21069030 challenged - ...

Importers challenge arecanut classification; Court remits case for fresh order after finding lack of opportunity.

Case Laws Customs

September 18, 2024

You may also like:

Transfer of case u/s 127 - centralization of case after search - delayed challenge to the order passed u/s 153A - the impugned order came to be passed on 19.02.2019 and...

The case involves a dispute regarding valuation for import assessment. The appellant challenges the rejection of declared value in favor of depreciated value in the...

Ex-parte order passed by CIT(A) set aside. Adequate opportunity of hearing not provided to assessee despite raising grounds challenging additions by AO. Principles of...

Effective opportunity - Courts have consistently interpreted the phrase 'effective opportunity' to mean and include an opportunity of personal hearing as well. In this...

The case involves property forfeiture under SAFEMA, which was also part of TADA proceedings. The Appellant's challenge based on different statutes was rejected. The...

Violation of principles of natural justice - petitioner was not provided with an adequate opportunity to defend SCN - The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of the...

Valuation of goods - contemporaneous import prices in the case of the other importers have not been challenged by Revenue - assessable cannot be rejected - AT

Who is the importer? - Valuation of imported goods - MEGPTCL did not hold itself out to be the importer. Undisputedly, the Bills of Entry were filed by PMC and right...

Confiscation - importer - the definition of 'importer' under Section 2 (26) of the Customs Act, 1962 - AT

The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns....

Registration u/s 80G(5) - The Tribunal found that the provision allowing expenditure of up to five percent for religious purposes did not apply to this case. - The...

Recovery notice - Validity of assessment orders - The High court observed that while personal hearings were offered to the petitioner, it was evident that the petitioner...

Oppression and mismanagement - Transfer of shares - Once it is accepted that the Appellant can also challenge the transfer of shareholding as being oppressive and as...

When common bill of entry in the name of several importers is filed by the courier agency and photocopies are given to the importers with the importers name appearing in...

Maintainability of Refund claim - Order of assessment was not challenged - the Tribunal upheld the department's action, stating that customs duty is to be charged based...

Quick Updates: