Arecanut classification under CTH 21069030 challenged - ...

Importers challenge arecanut classification; Court remits case for fresh order after finding lack of opportunity.

Case Laws Customs

September 18, 2024

Arecanut classification under CTH 21069030 challenged - provisional release of imported consignment - petitioner claims violation of natural justice as not heard before impugned order - Court holds petitioner uncooperative by not filing reply or attending hearing - impugned order appealable u/s 128 of Customs Act requiring 7.5% duty deposit - balancing interests, impugned order set aside, matter remitted to pass fresh order on merits in accordance with law.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Arecanut classification under CTH 21069030 challenged - ...

Importers challenge arecanut classification; Court remits case for fresh order after finding lack of opportunity.

Case Laws Customs

September 18, 2024

You may also like:

The case revolves around the rejection of the declared value by customs authorities and the subsequent enhancement of value based on a quotation obtained from a...

Effective opportunity - Courts have consistently interpreted the phrase 'effective opportunity' to mean and include an opportunity of personal hearing as well. In this...

Transfer of case u/s 127 - centralization of case after search - delayed challenge to the order passed u/s 153A - the impugned order came to be passed on 19.02.2019 and...

The case involves a dispute regarding valuation for import assessment. The appellant challenges the rejection of declared value in favor of depreciated value in the...

Ex-parte order passed by CIT(A) set aside. Adequate opportunity of hearing not provided to assessee despite raising grounds challenging additions by AO. Principles of...

Violation of principles of natural justice - petitioner was not provided with an adequate opportunity to defend SCN - The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of the...

Who is the importer? - Valuation of imported goods - MEGPTCL did not hold itself out to be the importer. Undisputedly, the Bills of Entry were filed by PMC and right...

Confiscation - importer - the definition of 'importer' under Section 2 (26) of the Customs Act, 1962 - AT

The department demanded Service Tax based on tally data retrieved, but failed to provide cogent reasons for doubting the authenticity of the records, violating...

The case involves property forfeiture under SAFEMA, which was also part of TADA proceedings. The Appellant's challenge based on different statutes was rejected. The...

Registration u/s 80G(5) - The Tribunal found that the provision allowing expenditure of up to five percent for religious purposes did not apply to this case. - The...

Valuation of goods - contemporaneous import prices in the case of the other importers have not been challenged by Revenue - assessable cannot be rejected - AT

Duty demand u/s 28(1) of Customs Act, 1962, upon importer and transferee of license issued by DGFT - Liability of transferee for fraudulently obtained license - Levy of...

When common bill of entry in the name of several importers is filed by the courier agency and photocopies are given to the importers with the importers name appearing in...

Customs authority rejected transaction value declared by importer and enhanced value based on email evidence and statement of partner admitting negotiated higher price....

Quick Updates: