The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various ...

Taxpayer scores partial victory as tribunal upholds genuine payments, deletes unsupported additions.

Case Laws Income Tax

September 18, 2024

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The Tribunal held that the amount representing payment to a contractor, M/s Growfast Realtors (P) Ltd, was duly proved and the addition as unexplained credits was unsustainable. Regarding payment to M/s Sarda Vanijya (P) Ltd, supported by an accountant's certificate and TDS deduction, the Tribunal accepted it as a business payment and deleted the addition as unexplained credits. For small trading liabilities where the assessee could not furnish documents for two parties, the Tribunal favored the assessee based on preponderance of probabilities and deleted the addition. For trading liabilities related to Kripa Infrastructure and Swastik Engineering, considering the overall facts, the Tribunal restricted the addition to 50% of the AO's addition. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was partly allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various ...

Taxpayer scores partial victory as tribunal upholds genuine payments, deletes unsupported additions.

Case Laws Income Tax

September 18, 2024

You may also like:

Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

Nature of Payment - Construction Activities and Taxability - relinquishment of trusteeship - Another set of appeals revolved around payments made to erstwhile trustees...

The ITAT Ahmedabad addressed Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments, focusing on royalty, management fees, and IT allocation costs. The tribunal upheld the use of the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of alleged bogus long-term capital gain u/s 10(38) concerning a transaction involving shares of a company flagged as a penny...

The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered an addition u/s 69 concerning a difference in agreed and actual deal value, attributed to unexplained source of stamp duty...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) under section 195, specifically disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for payments labeled as...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 for alleged bogus Long Term Capital Gains due to off-market cash purchase of shares. The taxpayer's claim for deduction...

The assessee received cash credits which were treated as unexplained income u/s 68 by the Assessing Officer (AO). However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

The assessee's contentions were upheld by the Tribunal regarding various additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal ruled that the RTGS transfer from the...

Addition of income u/s 56(2)(x)(b)(B) - under valuation of stamp duty value on purchase consideration of the property u/s 50C - The assessee asserts that only a partial...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues in the case. The AO made additions based on uncorroborated documents seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

The Appellate Tribunal considered two main issues: 1. Addition u/s 37(1) - Assessee incurred business loss due to default in property payment, allowed as revenue loss. 2....

Bogus LTCG - exemption u/s 10(38) denied - The AO contended that the LTCG was undisclosed income arising from alleged manipulation in penny stocks. However, the assessee...

Quick Updates: