2024 (8) TMI 373

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r affixation of stamp duty was higher - As decided by HC [ 2023 (6) TMI 1133 - DELHI HIGH COURT] it was not the respondent/assessee who effectuated the sale of the subject land. The subject land was sold by the secured lenders to recover from dues owed by the respondent/assessee, that the Tribunal correctly concluded that the PCIT had failed to notice the underlying facts, while invoking his power .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X