2024 (8) TMI 699

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... respond to the notices - HELD THAT:- It is noticed that the dispute arises on account of difference in the turnover in GSTR 7 and GSTR 3B. Perhaps, if the petitioner had responded to the notices that preceded the impugned order, the petitioner may have succeeded. The petitioner deserves a fresh chance to explain the case although no fault can be attributed to the first respondent for passing the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... C 01 dated 15.11.2023 have been confirmed. 3 . It is noticed that the petitioner has failed to respond to the notices and therefore, the impugned order has been passed confirming the demand proposed in the above mentioned notices. 4 . The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a Government Contractor and failed to notice that the notices that preceded the impugned order .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ad responded to the notices that preceded the impugned order, the petitioner may have succeeded. 8 . In my view, the petitioner deserves a fresh chance to explain the case although no fault can be attributed to the first respondent for passing the impugned order, as there was no reply. Considering the same, the impugned order is set aside and the case is remitted back to the first respondent to pa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X