2024 (8) TMI 730

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... face of record or not - HELD THAT:- Having carefully gone through the Review Petitions, the order under challenge and the papers annexed therewith, it is convincing that there is no error apparent on the face of the record or any merit in the Review Petitions, warranting reconsideration of the order impugned. The Review Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. - HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGA .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , Adv. Mr. Sahil Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, AOR M/S. Vedya Partners Aor, AOR Ms. Neelima Tripathi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Apoorv P. Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Dheeresh K. Dwividi, Adv. Ms. Poonam Meena, Adv. Mr. Vedya Partners Aor, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai, AOR Mr. Shantanu Kumar, AOR Dr. G.k.sarkar, Adv. Ms. Malabika Sarkar, Adv. Mr. Prashant Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Jain, AOR Ms. Divya Jain, Adv. Ms. Monica .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t Kumar Chaurasia, Adv. ORDER PER 1. Delay condoned. 2. Application for listing Review Petitions in open court is rejected. 3. Having carefully gone through the Review Petitions, the order under challenge and the papers annexed therewith, we are satisfied that there is no error apparent on the face of the record or any merit in the Review Petitions, warranting reconsideration of the order impugned .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X