9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (8) TMI 951X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l Excise and Central Goods and Services Tax, Pune-1, Dange shall explain why disciplinary action should not be taken against him and the concerned officers for losing original documents. It should be noted that by losing these original documents, respondents have also prejudiced their own case against petitioner. This is a serious issue. Therefore, this order be also forwarded to the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India and to the Chief Commissioner to whom the said Dange may report for information and necessary action. Petitioner s advocate is permitted to forward. Respondents are also to show cause why no action be taken against them for ma ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o state that respondents have not received any document referred to in petitioner s letter dated 9th July 2019. Ms. Pawar states that the signature on the letter dated 9th July 2019 is of one Mr. Yadav, the Inspector. 4 When we informed Mr. Adik why respondents have not promptly replied to petitioner s letter dated 3rd October 2023 and waited till February or March 2024 to reply, Mr. Adik requests the matter be stood over to enable him to personally enquire into the matter and try to find a solution. 5 Stand over to 5th August 2024. 6 Until 31st August 2024, there shall be ad-interim stay in terms of prayer clause (d) which reads as under : (d) Pending admission and final hearing of this Petition this Hon'ble court be please to by way o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... documents mentioned in the letter dated 9th July 2019 but the same are not traceable in the office record. The said Dange is totally silent as to whether he personally searched the documents. He also does not say who searched for the documents. He does not further state that whether any disciplinary action has been taken against the concerned officer for losing the documents. Mr. Adik says those documents are not relied upon by respondents but the fact is that those documents are required by petitioner to respond to the action being taken against petitioner. Therefore, by losing the original documents which have been admittedly taken from petitioner, respondents have prejudiced the rights of petitioner. This is a very serious matter which ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
