Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (9) TMI 19

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r the proviso to section 80G(5). Therefore, the ld. CIT(Exemptions) is not justified in denying the grant of approval u/s. 80G(5) to the appellant trust on the ground of delay in submission of Form No.10AB. As regards the compliance to the notices by the CIT(Exemptions), we find that in the instant case the hearing notices were sent through ITBA portal by the CIT(A). In our considered opinion, it is not a valid method and manner of service of notice as specified under the provisions of section 282(1) of the Act. Therefore, it is crystal clear that the notices were not served upon the appellant. To fortify our view, we would like to make a reference to a decision rendered in the case of Munjal BCU Centre of Innovation and Entrepreneurship [ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... al within six months from the date of provisional approval, i.e. on or before 03.10.2022, or as extended upto 30.09.2022 as per the CBDT Circular No.08/2022 dated 31.03.2022 whichever is earlier. Since the activities of the trust was already commenced as on the date of provisional approval, i.e. on 26.02.1981. The present application in Form No.10AB was filed by the appellant trust only on 29.09.2023. Therefore, the ld. CIT(Exemptions) denied the grant of approval on the grounds of delay. Further, the ld. CIT(Exemptions) observed that in the absence of compliance with the notices issued through ITBA portal on 24.11.2023, he could not reach a conclusion about the genuineness of the activities of the trust and the fulfilment of the conditions .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ade six months prior to expiry of the provisional approval or within six months of commencement of the activities whichever is earlier. 7. There can be two categories of institutions; (1) the institutions which had commenced the activity subsequent to the grant of provisional approval (2) the institutions which had commenced the activity much before the date of grant of provisional approval (2). No doubt, in the case of former category the literal interpretation of clause (iii) of proviso to section 80G(5) does not lead to any hardship, absurdity or injustice. It is only in the case of later category the literal interpretation leads to hardship, absurdity or injustice as it is impossible to comply with the time limits prescribed under the p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the above construction of clause (iii) of proviso to section 80G(5) the appellant trust is entitled to file the application for regular approval prior to six months of expiry of the provisional approval, i.e., on or before 03.10.2022. Therefore, it cannot be said that the application filed by the appellant trust for grant of regular approval is barred by limitation prescribed under the proviso to section 80G(5). Therefore, the ld. CIT(Exemptions) is not justified in denying the grant of approval u/s. 80G(5) to the appellant trust on the ground of delay in submission of Form No.10AB. 11. As regards the compliance to the notices by the ld. CIT(Exemptions), we find that in the instant case the hearing notices were sent through ITBA portal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ected to keep the e-portal of the Department open all the time so as to have knowledge of what the Department is supposed to be doing with regard to the submissions of forms etc. The principles of natural justice are inherent in the income-tax provisions and the same are required to be necessarily followed . 9 . Having noticed as above, this court is of the firm view that the petitioner has not been given sufficient opportunity to put up its please with regard to the proceedings under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act of 1961 and as it was not served with any notice. Therefore, he would be entitled to file his reply and the Department would of course be entitled to examine the same and pass a fresh order thereafter. 10 . In view of the abo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates