9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (7) TMI 1518X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... x along with the other members informed the petitioner that he had not been found to be qualified for opening of financial bid - Application praying for setting aside the notice whereby the petitioner was declared not qualified on the evaluation of technical bid submitted by the bidders including the petitioner - Petitioner is primarily aggrieved by the action of the respondents-Income Tax Department that having taken the premises in question on rent and having run its office for a period of more than 24 years, the respondents chose to vacate the premises of the petitioner without assigning any reasons for not continuing thereof - HELD THAT:- As not in dispute that the last lease agreement entered into between the parties on 1.7.2023, gave ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajib Ranjan Jha , Advocate For the Respondent : Ms. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi , Advocate JUDGMENT ( Per : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ) 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has filed the instant application praying for setting aside the notice dated 19.4.2024 issued under the signature of the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-1, Patna whereby the petitioner was declared not qualified on the evaluation of technical bid submitted by the bidders including the petitioner. 3. The case of the petitioner in brief is that the authorities of the Income Tax Department entered into an agreement dated 15.12.1999 with his grandmother by w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ated 19.4.2024, the Building Hiring Committee of the Department has found the petitioner to be not qualified, however no reasons have been assigned for the same in the notice. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the material on record, this Court finds that the petitioner is primarily aggrieved by the action of the respondents-Income Tax Department that having taken the premises in question on rent and having run its office for a period of more than 24 years, the respondents chose to vacate the premises of the petitioner without assigning any reasons for not continuing thereof. It is not in dispute that the last lease agreement entered into between the parties on 1.7.2023, copy of which has been brought on rec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
