Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (12) TMI 1536

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... licant is required to find the financial trails having crypto currencies which are yet to be unearthed. The offences are of serious nature and has international ramifications. It is also stated by applicant that in the present FIR, all the offences have maximum imprisonment of less or upto 7 years with or without fine and hence, notice under Section 41A Cr.PC is mandatorily required to be given as per the dicta of the judgment titled Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar Anr. [ 2014 (7) TMI 1143 - SUPREME COURT ]. This Court in a judgement titled as BHANU PRAKASH SINGH VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T. OF DELHI) [ 2021 (6) TMI 1175 - DELHI HIGH COURT] has opined that 'the law does not mandate a blanket ban on arrest of accused against whom there is a re .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ning and operating the call centre. Hence, the FIR. 4. In the reply filed before the learned Sessions Court, the respondent has stated that during interrogation, it transpired that it was in fact the applicant along with his brother, Mr. Vaibhav Arora who were running the call centre at Shadi Khampur Village, New Delhi-110008 and had employees who were working as Telecallers. The Telecallers have identified the applicant and his brother as the kingpin of the call centre. The statement of Mr. Jaiveer Sharma has also been taken which states that it is the applicant who had rented 3 cabins in M/s Ojas International at H. No. 2161/T-6, 4th Floor, Opp. Metro Pillar No. 231, Guru Arjun Nagar, Shadi Khampur Village, New Delhi-110008. These cabins .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r to be satisfied that the accused has committed the said offence, but he is also required to be satisfied that the arrest of the accused is necessary to prevent such person from committing any further offence, or for proper investigation of the offence or to prevent such person from exploiting the evidence of the offence to disappear or tamper such evidence in any manner or to prevent such person from making any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or the Police Officer, or unless such person is arrested his presence in the Court whenever required cannot be ensured, and the Police Officer shall record his reasons in writing while maki .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates