Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (10) TMI 372

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by entry No. 18 on the visitors register, as per which, complainant Surender Sharma had visited to GST office to meet petitioner at 12.00 noon. Even phone number of complainant is mentioned in the register which further corroborates the complainant s visit. Since the complainant was fed up of the demand, he made a complaint and taking advantage of secret passage in the premises and the absence of proper lighting in the said secret passage, petitioner fled away. Thus, it is a case where the petitioner is not entitled to bail. A perusal of the bail petition and the documents attached, prima facie points towards the petitioner s involvement and does not make out a case for bail. Any further discussions are likely to prejudice the petitioner; .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d on 03.04.2027, I received phone call from Sh. Suresh Chand Meena GST Inspector and I met him on 04.04.2024. He clearly told me that he could not get the GST Number without the SEWA-PANI and after this, he took a paper which was kept on the table and wrote down 20 and indicated the same towards me. I requested him for less amount being a poor person and then he struck down 20 and write down 10. I requested for payment of Rs. Five thousand but he refused and told me that the file will again be rejected. I recorded the said conversation and will produce the same before you. I have no personal grudge with him. Legal action may be taken against Sh. Suresh Chand Meena GST Inspector . On the basis of the complaint, it was found that a cognizable .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he petitioner with demand of bribe and he is not entitled to bail. 6. Counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court to FIR and its column No. 1 where the date and time of FIR is mentioned as 04.04.2024 at 19:45 hours and also to the general diary reference in column No. 3 (c) where general diary was also entered at 19.30 hours. He further submits that even as per general diary entry, the raiding party had gone to conduct the raid after office hours which fact clearly corroborates that the incident was shown as ante time and entries were made subsequently at 7.30 p.m. (19.30 hours). He further submits that a reading of DDR also shows that the police party had departed at that me and as such everything is concocted. 7. State co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... visit is corroborated by entry No. 18 on the visitors register, as per which, complainant Surender Sharma had visited to GST office to meet petitioner at 12.00 noon. Even phone number of complainant is mentioned in the register which further corroborates the complainant s visit. Since the complainant was fed up of the demand, he made a complaint and taking advantage of secret passage in the premises and the absence of proper lighting in the said secret passage, petitioner fled away. Thus, it is a case where the petitioner is not entitled to bail. 9. A perusal of the bail petition and the documents attached, prima facie points towards the petitioner s involvement and does not make out a case for bail. Any further discussions are likely to pr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates