9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (10) TMI 337X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... shipping bills have not been processed by Respondent No. 1. The Counter-Affidavit of Respondents also sets out that in view of the fact that the EDI shipping bills of the Petitioner were left blank and the electronic transmission in the automatic environment assumed the Shipping Bills No and accordingly proceeded to reject the case. Given that the Respondents have not examined case of the Petitioner, in view of the inadvertent error, the Court deems it expedient to direct the Respondent to undertake the examination of the 16 EDI shipping bills of the Petitioner afresh, treating its submissions as a Yes - The Petitioner and/or his authorised representative will be given an opportunity to be present for a personal hearing in the matter. The ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ereinafter referred to as the MEI Scheme ] as envisaged under Foreign Trade (Development Regulation) Act [hereinafter referred to as the FDRA ] framed under Section 3 of the FDRA in terms of paragraph 3.04 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 (FTP 2015-20). 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is entitled to reward under MEI Scheme in respect of various notified products that it has exported. 4. It is the contention of the Petitioner that as per the prescribed procedure an exporter is required to click Yes or No in the shipping bills which are generated in the Electronic Data Interface (EDI system) used by the Custom Department. It is only pursuant to declaration of such intent on the EDI system shipping bills th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... it is not getting benefit under the MEI Scheme in the sum of Rs. 23,37,185/-. It is the admitted case of the parties that in view of the inadvertent error the shipping bills have not been processed by Respondent No. 1. The Counter-Affidavit of Respondents also sets out that in view of the fact that the EDI shipping bills of the Petitioner were left blank and the electronic transmission in the automatic environment assumed the Shipping Bills No and accordingly proceeded to reject the case. 9. Given that the Respondents have not examined case of the Petitioner, in view of the inadvertent error, the Court deems it expedient to direct the Respondent to undertake the examination of the 16 EDI shipping bills of the Petitioner afresh, treating its ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
