2024 (10) TMI 1383

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and the auto-populated GSTR 2A - HELD THAT:- On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that the tax proposal relating to a mismatch between the petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and the auto-populated GSTR 2A was confirmed solely on the ground that the tax payer did not reply to the show cause notice. The admitted position is that a sum of Rs. 3,17,300/- wa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd that two parallel proceedings were initiated in respect of the same assessment period. The petitioner asserts that two parallel proceedings were initiated in respect of the same assessment period pursuant to scrutiny of returns. In view of the confusion entailed by the initiation of such proceedings, it is stated that the petitioner could not participate in proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ee reminders. 4. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that the tax proposal relating to a mismatch between the petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and the auto-populated GSTR 2A was confirmed solely on the ground that the tax payer did not reply to the show cause notice. The admitted position is that a sum of Rs. 3,17,300/- was appropriated from the petitioner's bank account. This amou .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X