Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (11) TMI 1376

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is made u/s 56(2)(viii)(c) on account of difference in the face value of fresh issue of shares by the company and book value of shares. We find that there is no whisper, in the assessment order, of any incriminating documents/records or any other evidence found or seized during the course of search proceedings which prompted such addition made in the case of the assessee. Section 56(2)(viii) of the Act is a deeming provision and the issue in this case under consideration is the pricing of the shares without any reference to any incriminating material found during the search. Further, the existence, identity and genuineness of the transaction has not been doubted by the AO. We also note that the assessee had filed return of income originally .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... enue has raised as many as 12 grounds of appeal, the solitary grievance raised by the Revenue relates to the deletion of the addition of Rs. 6,87,75,000/- made by the Assessing Officer u/s 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act, for short] when there was no incriminating document/material found during the course of search. 3. The representatives of both the sides were heard at length, the case records carefully perused and we have duly considered the documentary evidences brought on record in the form of Paper Book in light of Rule 18(6) of ITAT Rules. 4. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that a search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as 'The Act'] was conducted on 29.12.2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ld. counsel for the assessee reiterated that no incriminating materials were found with regard to the addition made and relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Abhisar Buildwell. 10. We have heard the rival submissions and have carefully perused the orders of the authorities below and the relevant material on record. Having heard the rival submissions, we find that the factual matrix of the instant case shows that the only seized document referred to in the assessment order by the AO at Para 3 of the assessment order is the list of shareholders of M/s Confident Distributors Pvt. Ltd, which included the assessee. The CIT(A) correctly held that the document is available in public domain and hence cannot be categorized as incriminating .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Abhisar Buildwell [supra] wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held as under: In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, it is concluded as under: i) that in case of search under Section 132 or requisition under Section 132A, the AO assumes the jurisdiction for block assessment under section 153A; ii) all pending assessments/reassessments shall stand abated; iii) in case any incriminating material is found/unearthed, even, in case of unabated/completed assessments, the AO would assume the jurisdiction to assess or reassess the total income taking into consideration the incriminating material unearthed during the search and the other material available with the AO includ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... -open the assessments made under Section 143(1)(a) or 143(3) of the Act, 1961 and to re- assess the total income taking notice of undisclosed income even found during the search and seizure operation. 15.1 In view of the discussion hereinabove, once during search undisclosed income is found on unearthing the incriminating material during the search, the AO would assume jurisdiction to assess or reassess the total income even in case of completed/unabated assessments. Therefore, the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the High Court taking the view that the AO has the power to reassess the return of the assessee not only for the undisclosed income, which was found during the search operation but also with regard to material that was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates