9911796707
TMI BlogUnraveling the Web: Forgery, Fake GST Firms, and the Pursuit of Economic JusticeX X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... jurisdiction of the court in economic offenses spanning multiple states, and the considerations for granting bail in such cases. ARGUMENTS PRESENTED The primary contentions of the parties (anonymized) are as follows: Prosecution: The accused persons committed the crime by making fraudulent firms using the PAN Card and Aadhaar Card of the informant, and through fake invoices, they breached the supply chain of Input Tax Credit (ITC) and gained illegal benefits. The use of the informant's PAN Card and Aadhaar Card for registering fake GST firms and issuing fake invoices amounts to forgery, which is detrimental to national interest. The statements made by the accused persons leading to the discovery of facts, such as laptops, mobiles, SIM c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nal Procedure, which states that an offense shall ordinarily be inquired into and tried by a court within whose local jurisdiction it was committed. The court held that although the fake firms were registered in Punjab and Maharashtra, the complainant resides in New Delhi, and the FIR was lodged in Gautam Buddh Nagar. Therefore, the court has jurisdiction as the genuineness of the complaint cannot be questioned based solely on the occurrence's location. Considerations for Granting Bail: The court extensively discussed the principles and considerations for granting or refusing bail, relying on various Supreme Court judgments. The court emphasized that economic offenses constitute a class apart and need to be viewed seriously, considering ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gaining illegal financial benefits through fake invoices. The accused persons were trying to cause deliberate delay in framing charges, indicating an attempt to interfere with the judicial process. Considering the gravity of the offense, the nature of evidence, the severity of punishment, the potential risk of tampering with witnesses, and the larger public interest, the court found it not a fit case for granting bail. Consequently, the court rejected the bail applications of the accused persons. DOCTRINAL ANALYSIS The legal principles discussed in this case revolve around the admissibility of evidence obtained through custodial statements, the jurisdiction of courts in economic offenses spanning multiple states, and the considerations for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ishment, the character of the accused, the possibility of tampering with witnesses, and the larger public interest. The court also addressed the principle of bail is the rule, jail is the exception, highlighting that exceptions exist in cases involving grave economic offenses, where the court must be cautious in exercising discretion to grant bail, especially when the accused holds a position of influence or power. Overall, the court's analysis and decision in this case reinforce the legal principles and doctrines surrounding the admissibility of evidence, jurisdiction in economic offenses, and the considerations for granting bail, while emphasizing the gravity of such offenses and their impact on society. Full Text : 2024 (9) TMI 1289 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
