9911796707
TMI Blog2012 (7) TMI 1174X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hta Raval for Respondent(s) : 1 Notice Served for Respondent(s) : 2 - 3 Mr Nilesh M Shah for Respondent(s) : 2, 4 Mr. YN Ravani for Respondent(s) : 3 ORAL ORDER 1. Heard Mr. Sunit Shah, learned counsel with Mr. N.V. Gandhi, learned advocate for the petitioner and Ms. Dharmishta Raval, learned advocate for respondent No.1, Securities Exchange Board of India ('SEBI' for short), Mr. Kavi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the respondent no.3-Bank of Baroda to not debit the petitioner's Over Draft Account with any further interest; 7(d) declare that the respondent no.3-Bank of Baroda was not supposed to charge any interest on Rs. 1,89,000/= in view of the withdrawal of the application by the petitioner; and accordingly the respondent no.3-Bank of Baroda shall give effect into the account;" 3. The respondents ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the fact that the petitioner has already filed an application-complaint dated 25.6.2011 before the respondent No.1. 6. The petitioner is relegated to the respondent No.1 being the competent authority under provisions of the Act to decide the controversy raised by the petitioner. 7. Therefore, present petition is disposed of with below mentioned observations. 8. Respondent No.1 will take into co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
